Exploring The 'Adjacent Possible' In
Your Maintenance Environment
By Ken Bannister, MEch (UK)
CMRP, MLE, Editor
Whenever I perform a Maintenance Operation Effectiveness Review (MOER) for a client, rarely do I find a maintainer who is truly satisfied with his or her current state. Many believe they are undervalued and misunderstood. Although most would welcome the chance to be
innovative and execute positive change, they can't imagine a different future state because of the “we’ve always done it this way” trap. In short, many maintenance team members want to change the status quo, but don't know how to unlock the door(s) to change. Often, the current state is so comfortable that it discourages change and makes the exploration of new possibilities very difficult
So how do we
generate an atmosphere that allows us to explore the edges of possibility in our existing working environments, networks, and formal/informal processes (habits) that frequently suppress innovation and relevant change? We do it by challenging the validity and value of each element of the current state, unlocking one door at a time. We do it through exploration of the adjacent possible.
In his 2010 book, Where Good Ideas Come From – The Natural History of Innovation, Steven Johnson describes the adjacent possible as a phrase that captures both the limits and creative potential of change and innovation. He goes on to liken it to a house that magically expands with each door you open: You begin with a room with four doors, each leading to a new room you haven’t yet visited. Those four rooms
are the adjacent possible that, once entered, leads to more doors and rooms you could not have reached from your original starting point.
Changing from a current state to a “Best Practice” state is a journey achieved by opening one door and exploring one room at a time to provide new insight into the validity and value of what we do. That's what a MOER is designed to do: open doors and flush out sources of innovation through exploration of “Why do we do what we do, when we do it, and does it make sense to continue to do it?" This
insight-generation process requires us to challenge our current processes, relationships with stakeholders and clients, perceptions, incongruities, deliverables, data management, and more.
While Maintenance is, arguably, the most integrated department within an organization, it's often treated as an operational and information silo. A MOER automatically takes on an integrated approach and applies the theory of adjacent possible through collaboration and exploration of partner relationships between Maintenance and its stakeholders and clients. Among other things, partners are invited to roundtable
discussions and encouraged to provide valuable context and insight on the relationship from their points of view. At the same time, they learn that to deliver quality service, Maintenance relies on its partners to supply detailed work requests, accurate information, easy access to assets, adequate funding, timely purchases, and the
like.
Similarly, a MOER applies the adjacent-possible theory to all business processes by systematically walking upstream or downstream through each process to diagnose the relevance and value of each step, based on current needs. As the adjacent possible opens, doors open, change moves forward into a new room, and business processes continue to be challenged and
updated.
To put it another way, Maintenance doesn’t have to stagnate in the “we’ve always done it this way” trap. Taking an adjacent-possible approach leads to positive, incremental, and meaningful change, one door and one room at a time.
kbannister@theramreview.com
MORE FRESH FOOD FOR THOUGHT THIS WEEK
Leading Indicators For Asset Management: OELE
(Overall Electrical Effectiveness)
By Drew Troyer, CRE, CMRP, Editor
Leading indicators like OELE help drive proactive plant-floor behaviors. The intent of this particular metric is to ensure electrical pathways in plant equipment are balanced, aligned, and unrestricted.
July 4th And The Flags Of The USA
By Bob Williamson, CMRP, CPMM, MIAM, Editor
This multi-tasking author isn’t just a respected RAM pro. Among other things, he seriously pursues his passion for flags and their history. This article delivers a short, non-work-related history lesson.
Avoiding Pump-Piping Mistakes
By Heinz Bloch, P.E., Editor
To get your piping right, distinctions must be made between implementation tasks assigned to pipe fitters and the reliability-focused engineering tasks that are assigned to piping designers.
Thoughts On Electrical Reliability
In A Green Economy
By Howard Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
Given the rate of technological advances, the future state of electrical reliability will be somewhat different than the current state. So will the levels of knowledge and skills to ensure that reliability.
BY T.A. COOK
Managing Maintenance As A Value Center
It’s a fact: Investing in maintenance improves business performance. Isn’t it time for maintenance professionals everywhere to take hold of their fate and start acting like the ‘value center’ they are?
LEST YOU MISSED IT ELSEWHERE
|
So, who's not concerned about ongoing supply-chain woes? Mike Williams of Chubb's Manufacturing Practice offers some helpful, even comforting advice in his article, "Managing Supply Chain Risks in An Increasingly Interconnected World," that's running on the Manufacturing.net
site.
Learn More
ABB has launched ABB Ability Condition Monitoring for Belts. According to the company, this advanced digital service offering is aimed at helping mine operators track speed, misalignment, damage, thickness and wear, slippage, and temperature of
conveyor belts in real time and, thus anticipate maintenance, avoid unplanned downtime, and improve belt reliability and lifetime.
|
|